People of the State of California v. Eugene Selivanov and Tatyana Berkovich: Defendant's Supplemental Reply Brief in Support of 995 Motion

  • Print

See an overview of this case

People of the State of California v. Eugene Selivanov and Tatyana Berkovich: Defendant’s Supplemental Reply Brief in Support of 995 Motion [Filed on June 19, 2012] Defendant’s Supplemental Reply Brief in Support of his Motion to Set Aside Information Pursuant to California Penal Code Section 995, arguing that the charges must be dismissed because the Prosecution failed to present admissible evidence supporting each element of each charged offense.

Ask A Question

From Our Blog

CCSA Offers Media Kit on UTLA/LAUSD Strike

The CCSA Communications Team is available to answer questions related to charter schools in Los Angeles.

CCSA: Deberíamos estar marchando juntos en Sacramento para obtener más fondos escolares para todos los niños

*PARA PUBLICACIÓN INMEDIATA * Martes 15 de enero de 2019 *Contacto con los medios: * Caity Heim 916-926-8234 cheim@ccsa.org NOTA: