People of the State of California v. Eugene Selivanov and Tatyana Berkovich: Defendant's Supplemental Reply Brief in Support of 995 Motion

  • Print

See an overview of this case

People of the State of California v. Eugene Selivanov and Tatyana Berkovich: Defendant’s Supplemental Reply Brief in Support of 995 Motion [Filed on June 19, 2012] Defendant’s Supplemental Reply Brief in Support of his Motion to Set Aside Information Pursuant to California Penal Code Section 995, arguing that the charges must be dismissed because the Prosecution failed to present admissible evidence supporting each element of each charged offense.

Ask A Question

From Our Blog

Webinar for Perkins Coordinators

On Wednesday, October 25, participate in a live webinar for new Perkins coordinators, hosted by the California Department of Education,

CCSA Answers: Receiving Credit for Emergency Days When Determining ADA

The recent fires in Northern California led to emergency closures at some charter schools. How can charter schools receive credit