People of the State of California v. Eugene Selivanov and Tatyana Berkovich: Defendant's Supplemental Reply Brief in Support of 995 Motion

  • Print

See an overview of this case

People of the State of California v. Eugene Selivanov and Tatyana Berkovich: Defendant’s Supplemental Reply Brief in Support of 995 Motion [Filed on June 19, 2012] Defendant’s Supplemental Reply Brief in Support of his Motion to Set Aside Information Pursuant to California Penal Code Section 995, arguing that the charges must be dismissed because the Prosecution failed to present admissible evidence supporting each element of each charged offense.

Ask A Question

From Our Blog

California's Charter Schools are Putting African American Students on the Path to Success

Unfortunately, neighborhood, skin color, and income level still determine the kind of education children receive in California. The good news

My charter school saved my life

In honor of Black History Month, La Kea harper, an African American alumna from College Bridge Academy in Compton, shares