People of the State of California v. Eugene Selivanov and Tatyana Berkovich: Defendant's Supplemental Reply Brief in Support of 995 Motion

  • Print

See an overview of this case

People of the State of California v. Eugene Selivanov and Tatyana Berkovich: Defendant’s Supplemental Reply Brief in Support of 995 Motion [Filed on June 19, 2012] Defendant’s Supplemental Reply Brief in Support of his Motion to Set Aside Information Pursuant to California Penal Code Section 995, arguing that the charges must be dismissed because the Prosecution failed to present admissible evidence supporting each element of each charged offense.

Ask A Question

From Our Blog

California Charter Schools Win Big at U.S. Academic Decathalon

CCSA congratulates [El Camino Real Charter High School](http://ecrchs.net/)'s Academic Decathalon team for its eighth overall win, and [Leemore Middle College

Participate in a Statewide Survey About the Local Control Funding Formula

The California Collaborative for Educational Excellence (CCEE) invites charter schools and charter management organizations to participate in a statewide survey